🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A campaign to erase African American heritage and legacy from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at an educational institution, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an time that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an foundation that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the history when it ignores the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and alertness to minor insults, but confronted with the threats that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.