🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had been made by mediators to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Path

The foreign minister is treading a complex route since Iran does not want be seen to be operating from a position of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the sites had been eliminated. Following this, Western states used their authority to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if talks restart.

The American leader last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of inactivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He stated the strikes began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Negotiations Continues the Primary Solution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently attempted to enforce their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the final answer to settle disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they address to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will get a answer in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the struggle of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and machinery, if damaged, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but were unable to destroy. The nation of Iran have developed more resilient, more integrated, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the face of this attack."